Half 3: Causality
My hope is that by the top of this text you should have an excellent understanding of how philosophical pondering round causation applies to your work as a knowledge scientist. Ideally you should have a deeper philosophical perspective to present context to your work!
That is the third half in a multi-part collection about philosophy and knowledge science. Half 1 covers how the speculation of determinism connects with knowledge science and half 2 is about how the philosophical discipline of epistemology may also help you assume critically as a knowledge scientist.
I really like what number of philosophical subjects take a seemingly apparent idea, like causality, and make you notice it’s not so simple as you assume. For instance, with out wanting up a definition, attempt to outline causality off the highest of your head. That could be a tough activity — for me a minimum of! This train hopefully nudged you to comprehend that causality isn’t as black and white as you’ll have thought.
Here’s what this text will cowl:
- Challenges of observing causality
- Deterministic vs probabilistic causality
- Regularity concept of causality
- Course of concept of causality
- Counterfactual concept of causality
- Bringing all of it collectively
David Hume, a well-known skeptic and certainly one of my favourite philosophers, made the astute commentary that we can’t observe causality straight with our senses. Right here’s a basic instance: we will see a baseball flying in the direction of the window and we will see the window break, however we can’t see the causality straight. We can’t…